GWAPP & NAG: 77 Commercial Street ULURP Testimony

by GWAPP on

* * * * * * * * * *
In case you were unable to attend the CB1 ULURP meeting re: 77 Commercial Street, we’re publishing our official testimony/statement here on the website for you to read. You can also download it (PDF). We’ll have a full recap of the meeting on the site ASAP.
* * * * * * * * * *
Neighbors Allied for Good Growth (NAG) and Greenpoint Waterfront Association for Parks and Planning (GWAPP) Testimony on Proposed 77 Commercial Street Development – Brooklyn Community Board 1, 8.20.13

Neighbors Allied for Good Growth (NAG) and the Greenpoint Waterfront Association for Parks & Planning (GWAPP) have conducted a lengthy review of the proposed transfer of air rights to 77 Commercial Street. What follows are our comments on the application based on our experience working in North Brooklyn and feedback from our neighbors.

In the previous ULURP hearing regarding Greenpoint Landing, we highlighted the broken promises and unfulfilled potential of the 2005 Waterfront Rezoning Agreement (WRA) and recommended modifications to that ULURP request that, at very least, guaranteed the delivery of the parks and affordable housing that the community has been waiting 8 years for.

In this application regarding 77 Commercial Street the issues for the community are even more pointedly about the lack of the city’s follow-through on the WRA.

The additional height and bulk being requested is offensive to many in the community because it is so completely out of context with the surrounding neighborhood. But, the inevitability of taller, bigger buildings was implicit in the WRA’s description of the sale of air rights from 65 Commercial Street to a contiguous property. That’s what air rights do – they sell to the adjacent landowner the right to build bigger and higher than they ordinarily would be allowed.

Our issues with this action don’t really concern the developer or the development per se. They are about the city failing to deliver on promises that were intended to protect and enhance, at some minimal level, the quality of life of the people who live in this community.

What the community must demand in this ULURP action is that the City deliver all the promised elements of the 2005 WRA:

  • Guarantee 200 units of affordable housing at AMIs actual reflective of the community
  • The removal of the MTA and the ERB from 65 Commercial Street (Currently, the City says they have a commitment to move the MTA but no timetable for moving the ERB. After 8 years, that is not acceptable.)
  • Restore the $14.5 million (in 2005 dollars) in funding that was promised in the 2005 WRA and build the park at 65 Commercial Street
  • Explain how the air rights for 65 Commercial, which were appraised at $12m 8 years ago have now been sold for 25% less in the midst of one of the hottest real estate markets in the country.
  • Use the funds ($8m) from the sale of the 65 Commercial Street air rights that, according to the 2005 WRA, were to be earmarked for something called the Greenpoint Williamsburg Affordable Housing and Infrastructure Fund and, instead, invest $4m in a comprehensive study and action plan for infrastructure, including transportation, and $4m in a Tenant Displacement Fund to provide legal assistance and other resources to displaced families in Greenpoint.

These are our recommendations to the committee.

GWAPP

GWAPP

The Greenpoint Waterfront Association for Parks & Planning, Inc. ("GWAPP") is a not-for-profit group, 501(c)(3), comprised of individuals, community organizations, religious institutions, and concerned citizens from the Greenpoint-Williamsburg communities dedicated to the development of parks and public access on the Greenpoint waterfront.
  • More Development = Long Promised Park? CB1 Meeting Notes (8/20) | Greenpointers commented:

    […] As with the Greenpoint Landing hearing, the Greenpoint Waterfront Association for Parks (GWAPP) and Neighbors Allied for Good Growth (NAG) put forth several recommendations for CB1’s consideration. I encourage you read their proposals.  […]

    Reply

Respond

respond-form